The Daily Wire: Craig Thomson: Do You Believe Him? - The Daily Wire

Jump to content

  • 33 Pages +
  • « First
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33

Craig Thomson: Do You Believe Him?

#641 User is offline   lenxyz 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 19-January 11

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:29 PM

View PostHDMC, on 03 December 2013 - 05:24 PM, said:


[Off topic edit - Len, is anyone maintaining this site any more? Last time I tried, the italics and link buttons were not working, don't know about the others]


HDMC,

It has been quiet. Probably, everyone having a breather after the election. I haven't posted, but I have kept reading the blog most days. I don't know about maintaining functuality. It seems to work ok at the moment

I exercise duties as moderator. A pretty easy job right now. I have no idea about technical issues behind the site.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#642 User is offline   HDMC 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1616
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNQ

Posted 03 December 2013 - 06:37 PM

View Postlenxyz, on 03 December 2013 - 06:29 PM, said:

HDMC,

It has been quiet. Probably, everyone having a breather after the election. I haven't posted, but I have kept reading the blog most days. I don't know about maintaining functuality. It seems to work ok at the moment

I exercise duties as moderator. A pretty easy job right now. I have no idea about technical issues behind the site.





Thanks Len. It could be me, I recently downloaded IE 11 and it jerks me around on some sites.

I'll try it with Chrome next time.




Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#643 User is offline   HDMC 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1616
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNQ

Posted 04 December 2013 - 08:34 AM

To get back on topic,

Quote


The prosecution, who were well aware that this outcome was not only possible but also extremely likely went into meltdown. Detective Sergeant John Tyquin became visibly enraged at the outcome witnesses have reported, perhaps he can sense a wrongful arrest case coming, after all there were serious questions on the arrest warrant used.




The prosecutor Deborah Mandie said she was determined to appeal the decision and attempted to have the trial delayed until next year.




Clearly becoming increasingly frustrated at the prosecutions further attempts to delay their fraught case Magistrate Rozencwajg stated;




“You have had almost a year to prepare”



“It’s about time you bit the bullet”



The prosecution was given a two and a half hour break to get their act together as it would seem a year is not long enough to prepare when you are prosecuting a case for a Victorian police squad unable to uncover any evidence to back up their charges.




It is also worth noting that although being given the time off the prosecution decided not to cross the road to the Supreme Court to lodge an appeal with a judge despite their ranting that they would.


Wixxy.


Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#644 User is offline   lenxyz 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 374
  • Joined: 19-January 11

Posted 04 December 2013 - 11:00 AM

View PostHDMC, on 04 December 2013 - 08:34 AM, said:

To get back on topic,

Quote

It is also worth noting that although being given the time off the prosecution decided not to cross the road to the Supreme Court to lodge an appeal with a judge despite their ranting that they would.

Wixxi



Wixxi jumping the gun as usual:

Quote

The court heard 79 charges of obtaining property and financial advantage by deception would consequently be dismissed. Crown prosecutors will fight that ruling in the Victorian Supreme Court later today in a bid to have the charges reinstated.

Ms Taylor today said documents to put before the Supreme Court seeking a stay of the magistrate's hearing were still being finalised.


http://www.theaustra...d-1226774931499
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#645 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 04 December 2013 - 01:22 PM

Sounds like the prosecution are pushing all manner of substances up a variety of inclines...

The latest is that the magistrate has refused to delay his hearing in order for the prosecution to include charges from out of state and so 'prove Thompson's criminality.'

It's all sounding a bit desperate.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#646 User is offline   HDMC 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1616
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNQ

Posted 04 December 2013 - 03:46 PM

View Postlenxyz, on 04 December 2013 - 11:00 AM, said:

Wixxi jumping the gun as usual:



http://www.theaustra...d-1226774931499


Hardly.

He didn't say they wouldn't, he said they hadn't.


Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#647 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 29 January 2014 - 12:02 PM

Things looking a bit sticky for young Craig....
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#648 User is offline   BOOBOO 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 243
  • Joined: 01-December 11

Posted 18 February 2014 - 09:48 AM

Finally with confidence we can answer the question posed
No....No.....No
And this by the look of it is just the beginning!
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#649 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 18 February 2014 - 10:49 AM

Yes it.will be interesting to see what the.sentence is.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#650 User is offline   icey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3501
  • Joined: 13-January 11
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 18 April 2014 - 01:00 PM

View Postscotto, on 18 February 2014 - 10:49 AM, said:

Yes it.will be interesting to see what the.sentence is.


Posted Image


12 months’ jail, with nine months suspended for two years and this, for a crime he didn't do. :emot-roflolmao:
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#651 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 18 April 2014 - 02:21 PM

old news by now Icey, but what's that - you don't think he did it?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#652 User is offline   icey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3501
  • Joined: 13-January 11
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 18 April 2014 - 09:22 PM

View Postscotto, on 18 April 2014 - 02:21 PM, said:

old news by now Icey, but what's that - you don't think he did it?


The "crime he didn't do" was according to the key player.

It was a tired and yet newsworthy story for a year or two, primarily on account of Pinocchio's brazen tears and the staunch defence by full-support Julia.

Old news? On deaf (or a dead leftie forum's) ears, you pondered "what the.sentence" might be.

I alone replied.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#653 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 19 April 2014 - 05:41 PM

Yawn. We know he was found guilty. It was a month ago. Next?

How about that NSW premier? And the three Lib MPs up next at ICAC? And Georgie Brandis off his trolley about equal time for climate change deniers?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#654 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 20 April 2014 - 06:25 AM

Looks like it's gonna be another month before any more word from the cult.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

Share this topic:


  • 33 Pages +
  • « First
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33


Fast Reply