The Daily Wire: NSW Greens, Vol. 2. - The Daily Wire

Jump to content

  • 17 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »

NSW Greens, Vol. 2.

#21 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:37 AM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 07:45 AM, said:

My link

Now, Frogman, what do you think that you might have done to save the old lady had you been passing bye. Ring the police?

Clearly there's a need for 83 year olds to carry automatic shotguns.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#22 User is offline   Frogman 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 683
  • Joined: 31-October 11
  • LocationPerth

Posted 03 July 2012 - 08:55 AM

Why do you insist on asking questions that I have already explained why I cant answer, and why any answer I give will be next to useless?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#23 User is offline   icey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3500
  • Joined: 13-January 11
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 03 July 2012 - 10:15 AM

View PostFrogman, on 03 July 2012 - 08:55 AM, said:

Why do you insist on asking questions that I have already explained why I cant answer, and why any answer I give will be next to useless?


It appears you are selectively incapable of thinking, and certainly not imaginative, so I'll try to lead by example.

Roderick, I've only used air rifles and a .22, and that was a long, long time ago, and I possess no such weapon now.

If I was faced with the terrible scene of an 83 year old woman being attacked by more than one Rottweiler, I'd be looking for a lump of timber or other improvised weapon with which to whack the dogs on the skull - the harder the better. If I was wearing my steel capped boots, they could be handy albeit a bit riskier.

The previously referred to adrenline would perhaps make my response all the more impulsive and without consideration of possible adverse consequences.

It would be surely be a great time to have a gun though.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#24 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:06 PM

View PostFrogman, on 03 July 2012 - 08:55 AM, said:

Why do you insist on asking questions that I have already explained why I cant answer, and why any answer I give will be next to useless?

Why would your answer be next to useless?

Think of the scenario, old woman about to be severely injured or worse, would you attack the dogs?
-----------------------------

The average number of attacks in NSW is 5,000 per year there may be a similar average in WA.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#25 User is offline   Frogman 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 683
  • Joined: 31-October 11
  • LocationPerth

Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:16 PM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 12:06 PM, said:

Why would your answer be next to useless?

Quote

No you amazingly dense lump of atoms.

You asked me to tell you what I would do in a situation that 1) I have never been in before 2) Is amazingly heated and would be full of adrenaline for anyone involved 3) Doesnt happen all that often

There is no way I could answer that with any degree of certainty, and anyone with any sort of common sense or logic could tell you that. Any answer I gave would have been as useful as the one that I did. But noooooo, you had to miss the point in such an amazingly idiotic way that now I have to type this out to spell it out for you in a way that is frankly, fucking painful for me. It hurts me to think that there are people voting who cant quite grasp basic logic. It annoys me that you want to score cheap points of what is a rare tragedy. Next you will be bleating on about asylum seekers and how they are economic migrants, as if that makes any difference to the matter.

In other words, ask sensible questions, and you might get a sensible answer.


Admit it. You dont even bother to read things do you?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#26 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM

View PostFrogman, on 03 July 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:

Admit it. You dont even bother to read things do you?

I do read things and I suggest that you read this Handling a dog attack.
Never know it might just save your life.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#27 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 03 July 2012 - 12:33 PM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:

I do read things and I suggest that you read this Handling a dog attack.
Never know it might just save your life.

so.... we're preparing ourselves for all kinds of possible, however unlikely, attacks from various sources, many of these attacks being on elderly people. I'm assuming one of the right moves here is to not get old. Failing that, become paranoid and insist on the right to carry heavy artillery in one's pocket.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#28 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 03 July 2012 - 01:41 PM

View Postscotto, on 03 July 2012 - 12:33 PM, said:

so.... we're preparing ourselves for all kinds of possible, however unlikely, attacks from various sources, many of these attacks being on elderly people. I'm assuming one of the right moves here is to not get old. Failing that, become paranoid and insist on the right to carry heavy artillery in one's pocket.

A dog attack is not unlikely at all, read David Shoebridge's statement. He, for one, appears to think that there is considerable danger.

Or is he just a Green politician trying to score points by bringing up what you seem to think is inconsequental?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
1

#29 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 03 July 2012 - 01:47 PM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:

A dog attack is not unlikely at all, read David Shoebridge's statement. He, for one, appears to think that there is considerable danger.

Or is he just a Green politician trying to score points by bringing up what you seem to think is inconsequental?

It's you bringing up all these things here: dogs attacks on the elderly; rape against the elderly; home invasions against the elderly....
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#30 User is offline   icey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3500
  • Joined: 13-January 11
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 03 July 2012 - 02:28 PM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:

I do read things and I suggest that you read this Handling a dog attack.


Quote

If the dog is biting someone else, do not pull the victim away for the very same reason. Find a large stick and strike the dog across the back of the neck.


Do I win a Dailywire prize for being the only contestant with my blow to the dog's head with a piece of timber? Or am I disqualified 'cos of the following line?

Quote

Don't hit a large dog on the head. Big dogs, especially mastiff-type breeds have very thick skulls and you will only make it angry


The gun still sounds useful.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#31 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:37 PM

View Posticey, on 03 July 2012 - 02:28 PM, said:

The gun still sounds useful.

It's a bit of a fantasy... moving target, moving shooter, panic, fear, adrenaline, shooting bystanders and helpers instead of the dog...
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#32 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:38 PM

View Postscotto, on 03 July 2012 - 01:47 PM, said:

It's you bringing up all these things here: dogs attacks on the elderly; rape against the elderly; home invasions against the elderly....


I'm only bringing these things to your attention; this is, after all, a discussion forum :rolleyes:
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#33 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 03 July 2012 - 03:39 PM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 03:38 PM, said:

I'm only bringing these things to your attention; this is, after all, a discussion forum :rolleyes:

right... so let's discuss your paranoia...
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#34 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 03 July 2012 - 04:23 PM

View Postscotto, on 03 July 2012 - 03:39 PM, said:

right... so let's discuss your paranoia...


OK, away you go.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#35 User is offline   scotto 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • View blog
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 4300
  • Joined: 14-January 11
  • LocationNewcastle, NSW

Posted 04 July 2012 - 09:51 AM

View PostRoderick, on 03 July 2012 - 04:23 PM, said:

OK, away you go.

I've already pointed out your postings regarding a variety of horrible things happening to grandparents.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#36 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:19 AM

View Postscotto, on 04 July 2012 - 09:51 AM, said:

I've already pointed out your postings regarding a variety of horrible things happening to grandparents.

Don't just refer us to past posts, get stuck into it and make some detailed and pertinent observations; you never know your insightful postings may be of help to me and many others.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#37 User is offline   Roderick 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2747
  • Joined: 15-April 12
  • LocationNew England, NSW, Australia

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:25 AM

From Robert Borsak, Shooters and Fishers's Party MP.

Quote

Assault, abuse, spitting: the Green way

Posted on 2 July 2012 by Content Manager

SFP MLC Robert Borsak calls on Greens MLC Cate Faehrmann to apologise to the lone protester, Andrew*, who was set upon, spat on and bashed by some of her henchman at a protest in Wahroonga yesterday.
While Ms Faehrmann stirred up the crowd with anti-hunting rhetoric and spin, her supporters showed they can be violent, hateful and downright foul as a group of them assaulted the lone man for trying to voice his opinions.
Democracy and freedom of speech are a one-way street for these hypocrites, who espouse the right to protest and say they abhor violence yet turn on those who oppose them. “No one should be surprised by the actions of Greens and their supporters,” Mr Borsak said. “When it comes to violence, it’s Green-necks like these people who are the real threat to public debate and decency.”
The Greens and the National Parks Association – and perhaps even the National Parks and Wildlife Service, which was represented by uniformed staff – must explain their continued support for these unacceptable tactics. They must take responsibility for the actions of their followers. It is bad enough that they continue to lie to the public in their vehement denial of the benefits of allowing licensed Conservation Hunters into selected National Parks. Faehrmann has no genuine arguments against the new law so tries to discredit it with emotional language, saying it was agreed to “in the middle of the night” (it was early afternoon), it is a “sell out” (nothing is being sold) and it is an attack on “our environment” as if the environment doesn’t also belong to hunters who love and respect it.

The NPA produces pamphlets showing cartoon hunters shooting at native animals, something that is not only illegal but goes against the core ethics of volunteer Conservation Hunters who help control feral and game animals on public land. Clearly, the truth gets in the way of the NPA’s efforts to exploit the emotions of the NSW public.

Make no mistake: the Greens are on an ideological crusade fuelled by baseless beliefs, and they seem to believe it gives them to right to break the law, assault opponents and lie to the public. It is a marked contrast to the rest of the community, which achieves positive outcomes through open debate and is embracing sustainable, long-term management of public land for the benefit of all. *We have not used Andrew’s surname, at the request of his family


Comments??
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

Self-defence is not only a Right, it is an Obligation.
0

#38 User is offline   Frogman 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 683
  • Joined: 31-October 11
  • LocationPerth

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:31 AM

View PostRoderick, on 04 July 2012 - 10:25 AM, said:

Comments??

No names, no dates no locations, no link to news article, SFP MP involved, no verifiable details, blaming the left for violence that probably didnt happen, assert that the greens are on an ideological campaign as if it were a bad thing.

I suppose my main comment would be "yawn"
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#39 User is offline   icey 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3500
  • Joined: 13-January 11
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 04 July 2012 - 10:39 AM

View PostFrogman, on 04 July 2012 - 10:31 AM, said:

No names, no dates no locations, no link to news article, SFP MP involved, no verifiable details, blaming the left for violence that probably didnt happen, assert that the greens are on an ideological campaign as if it were a bad thing.

I suppose my main comment would be "yawn"


Don't lose your mojo frog. Here's the source and the greens ideological campaign is a bad thing, but that's just mho.
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

#40 User is offline   Frogman 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 683
  • Joined: 31-October 11
  • LocationPerth

Posted 04 July 2012 - 11:09 AM

View Posticey, on 04 July 2012 - 10:39 AM, said:

Don't lose your mojo frog. Here's the source

Oh my.

This just gets more and more delicious. Ok, so there is a peaceful rally going on to protest the changes to the hunting arrangements in the national parks. Whoever it was caved to the shooters and fishers to allow the unpopular changes to go ahead. 1 (one) person showed up to counterprotest (couldn't the SFP mobilise more supporters, or were they all too busy shooting things?) and was a complete dick about it, using a megaphone to talk over the MP speaking at the protest.

The following life and death situation ensued, where the hapless Andrew had his megaphone taken off him, and was then allowed to hang around, but chose to leave.

http://hornsby-advoc...rotest-scuffle/

Please note the muscled up and obviously on steroids thugs who assault the hapless Andrew.

So, my amended comments are "chuckle. yawn."

Quote

and the greens ideological campaign is a bad thing, but that's just mho.


Why? What do you think the greens ideological campaign sets out to achieve?
Register so you can post replies with ease and remove this message.
Already registered? Please login now to make this message go away.
Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter

0

Share this topic:


  • 17 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »


Fast Reply